[mpen-dayton] FW: "URGENT: Republican-led Congress trying to usurp FCC authority" & "A Christian Nation? Since When?" & "George Will Confirms Nixon's Vietnam Treason"

FYI.     Best, Munsup

P.S. "He who dares not offend cannot be honest" - Thomas Paine
P.P.S. Please reply back to me with ‘unsubscribe’ on the subject line if you no longer want to receive my e-Newsletters. The convenient link to unsubscribe is no longer available due to security reasons.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

·         FW: Lt. Cotton in Iraq

·         FW: stop-internet-sales-tax-mandate-us-senate

·         FW: We support the USW unfair labor practices strike against big oil companies

·         FW: URGENT: Republican-led Congress trying to usurp FCC authority

·         FW: Add your name: Thank the FCC for voting for Net Neutrality

·         FW: How many Christians would accept Jesus as a 1st century rabbinical Jew?

·         FW: Breaking (NY Times): "Evangelicals Aim to Mobilize an Army for Republicans in 2016"

·         FW: A Christian Nation? Since When?

·         FW: Traitorous Tricky Dick (George Will Confirms Nixon's Vietnam Treason)

·         FW: SPLC files suit against private probation company under RICO act

·         FW: Report on Domestic Terrorism/Lynching in America

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Eric Kramer
Subject: Lt. Cotton in Iraq

Bringin' it home.... -  E

 

 

From: Ann Keller
Subject: stop-internet-sales-tax-mandate-us-senate

Stop the Internet Sales Tax Mandate in the U.S. Senate | Americans for Tax Reform

		Stop the Internet Sales Tax Mandate in the U.S. Senate | Americans for Tax Reform An unholy coalition of Republicans and Democrats want to tax your Internet anyway they can.  The Senate wants to allow all 50 states the ability to tax across state lines, effectively exposing taxpayers to all 50 state revenue departments.
		View on www.atr.org	Preview by Yahoo

 

 

From: MARGARET PETERS
Subject: We support the USW unfair labor practices strike against big oil companies

Hi, I signed a petition to Ben van Beurden, CEO, Royal Dutch Shell Oil Company which says: "We support the unfair labor practice strike by steelworkers at the refineries in Texas City, Texas, and across the country. Their struggle is the struggle of working people in this country and around the world. We all want safe refineries and safe communities.

Will you sign this petition? Click here: http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/we-support-the-usw-strike?source=s.em.mt&r_by=315978

Then share the petition.  - Thanks!

 

 

From: Rachel Colyer; Daily Kos
Subject: URGENT: Republican-led Congress trying to usurp FCC authority.

For the next two weeks, Congress plans to drag the FCC to Capitol Hill a total of FIVE times to question them about net neutrality—and a few other things, like (potentially cutting) FCC funding and a witch hunt about Obama’s involvement.

This is ludicrous. But it’s no surprise—we completely expected Republicans in Congress to attack the rules through any means necessary. To be clear, anything that comes out of Congress will certainly be worse than the strong, legally enforceable, carefully crafted rules the FCC implemented. Congress needs to stay out of this and let the FCC do its job.

Please call your member/s of Congress and express your support for net neutrality as their constituent. Be simple and genuine. Tell them you support the FCC’s plan for net neutrality and encourage them to do the same—feel free to add any additional thoughts.

Then, use this quick questionnaire to report back how your call went.

Can’t call? Or, want to do more? Please, click here to sign and send a petition directly to your member of Congress who sits on one of the committees this week. Each message is specially tailored to address where your member of Congress stands—for or against a free and open internet.

In Congress, we’ve already been kicking butt—we’ve all but effectively killed the Thune/Upton bill and Blackburn’s bill doesn’t appear to be going anywhere.

We are winning—we need to keep up the pressure on Congress and overshadow their farce by showing overwhelming support for net neutrality on Capitol Hill.

Please make a phone call and click here to send an email. Let’s make so much noise that Congress backs off or declares their support for the FCC rules.

 

 

From: Maria, Victoria, Jadzia, Milan, and the rest of the team, MoveOn.org Civic Action
Subject: Add your name: Thank the FCC for voting for Net Neutrality

The FCC just released the full text of the historic Net Neutrality rules that MoveOn members like you have fought for for nearly a decade, and they confirm that we've won a huge victory—and that Comcast, Verizon, and their friends in Congress continue to lie.

Click here to thank the FCC for protecting the open Internet!

Now, Republicans in Congress are putting the three FCC commissioners who stood with us and voted for an open Internet through the ringer—with not one, not two, but three hearings this week on the new Net Neutrality rules. And two more hearings the week after.

We need to let the FCC commissioners who did the right thing know that we've got their back—that Internet users everywhere appreciate what they've done to stand with us, and that they've got our support as they approach the gauntlet.

Will you add your name to the thank-you note to the three FCC commissioners who voted for Net Neutrality—Chairman Tom Wheeler and Commissioners Mignon Clyburn and Jessica Rosenworcel?

We'll deliver your signatures this week as these hearings get underway, so that the the FCC, members of Congress, and the media know that these historic Net Neutrality rules are here to stay.

Our friends at Fight for the Future put together this easy-to-read summary of the contents of the FCC Net Neutrality rules that was so helpful we wanted to pass it along:

You can read them in full here—but since it's 313 pages (of fiery, Comcast-slaying justice), we wanted to give you a quick rundown of what the rules do and don't do. But don't stop reading after the summary, because Comcast is already on the attack and there's more to do right now.

• ISPs and their friends in government can't block you from visiting a website. So you can visit any site that you want.
• They can't slow down access to websites. So the sites you want to visit will come to you as quickly as the sites Comcast wishes you were visiting.
• They can't speed up or make certain websites load faster. This is absolutely critical, because if they could speed up certain sites, that functionally means slowing down other sites.
• They can't get between you and any content, application, service, or anything else that you want to access online. That is explicitly one of the rules. Just in case the other rules don't cover something.
• There are no new taxes or fees anywhere in the rules, and there's nothing limiting investment. At all. Period.

All of that is to say two simple, wonderful words: we won. And not only that, we won because of the work of people like you. Activism is mentioned time and again in the rules, and there's barely an article written that doesn't talk about it.

(Thanks, Fight for the Future, for that great summary!)

Help defend the victory that you made possible by thanking the three FCC commissioners who voted for Net Neutrality as they come under attack by Big Cable and their allies in Congress.

Thanks for all you do.

Want to support our work? We're entirely funded by our 8 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. Start a monthly donation here or chip in a one-time donation here.

 

 

From: Eric Kramer
Subject: How many Christians would accept Jesus as a 1st century rabbinical Jew?

I thought you might find this interesting.  Hope you're well.   -  Eric

http://www.alternet.org/how-did-jesus-get-be-so-hot-fascinating-history-wildly-unrealistic-depictions-savior?akid=12893.275073.P1RAD7&rd=1&src=newsletter1033250&t=8

 

 

From: Michael Keegan, People For the American Way
Subject: Breaking (NY Times): "Evangelicals Aim to Mobilize an Army for Republicans in 2016"

The New York Times yesterday profiled David Lane, the Religious Right figure perhaps most at the helm of Republican base organizing efforts heading into 2016.

His views that legal abortion and marriage equality will bring God’s wrath on America and the army of voters he hopes to mobilize are really just the tip of the iceberg in terms of why Americans should be worried about Lane and his operation.

PFAW has been tracking and writing about Lane and his close ties with Republican politicians for a long time, exposing even more critical information than what was covered in the Times article. We have a pending report about Lane to further expose the radical nature of what he’s pushing, the funders that back him and what successful Republican candidates could end up owing him and his cohorts.

Will you chip in today with a contribution to help us disarm the Right’s secret weapon by further exposing this radical extremist and the GOP office seekers who continue to kiss his ring?

David Lane wants the next president to be elected by an "army" of right-wing evangelicals.

It’s great that the Times is shedding some light on Lane’s political operation and close relationships with several Republican presidential hopefuls. However, the Times left out why its readers should really care about Lane -- his agenda.

Once his “good friends” like Ted Cruz, Bobby Jindal and other Republican politicians move up the ranks and gain more power, David Lane and the movement he represents will expect adherence to an incredibly dangerous reframing of our core national principles.

• Lane argues that America was founded “for the glory of God and the advancement of the Christian faith.”
• He denounces Supreme Court rulings upholding church-state separation and worked successfully to unseat judges in Iowa who ruled for marriage equality.
• He demands the Bible become a primary textbook in public schools.
• He calls homosexuality a threat to national survival and calls on Congress to impeach federal judges who rule that same-sex couples be treated equally under the law.
• He insists that America must choose between being a Christian or secular -- “pagan” -- nation and will not have peace until it does so.
• He is even recruiting and mobilizing far-right evangelical clergy to run for office in order to carry out this divisive and troubling vision of what he believes America should be.

PFAW and our Right Wing Watch are at the forefront of tracking, exposing and countering right-wing threats like David Lane and the well-funded political operation he has cultivated.

We will continue to expose his views, his increasingly close relationships with candidates and officeholders, and even his funding. And we’ll do the same for other dangerous right-wing leaders.

But we need the continued support of all our members to keep up the work and make sure it’s as effective as it can be.

Will you chip in now to help us continue to expose and fight back against extremists like David Lane?

 

 

From: Jim Hagan
Subject: A Christian Nation? Since When?

SundayReview | Opinion

A Christian Nation? Since When?

By KEVIN M. KRUSEMARCH 14, 2015

AMERICA may be a nation of believers, but when it comes to this country’s identity as a “Christian nation,” our beliefs are all over the map.

Just a few weeks ago, Public Policy Polling reported that 57 percent of Republicans favored officially making the United States a Christian nation. But in 2007, a survey by the First Amendment Center showed that 55 percent of Americans believed it already was one.

The confusion is understandable. For all our talk about separation of church and state, religious language has been written into our political culture in countless ways. It is inscribed in our pledge of patriotism, marked on our money, carved into the walls of our courts and our Capitol. Perhaps because it is everywhere, we assume it has been from the beginning.

But the founding fathers didn’t create the ceremonies and slogans that come to mind when we consider whether this is a Christian nation. Our grandfathers did.

Back in the 1930s, business leaders found themselves on the defensive. Their public prestige had plummeted with the Great Crash; their private businesses were under attack by Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal from above and labor from below. To regain the upper hand, corporate leaders fought back on all fronts. They waged a figurative war in statehouses and, occasionally, a literal one in the streets; their campaigns extended from courts of law to the court of public opinion. But nothing worked particularly well until they began an inspired public relations offensive that cast capitalism as the handmaiden of Christianity.

The two had been described as soul mates before, but in this campaign they were wedded in pointed opposition to the “creeping socialism” of the New Deal. The federal government had never really factored into Americans’ thinking about the relationship between faith and free enterprise, mostly because it had never loomed that large over business interests. But now it cast a long and ominous shadow.

Accordingly, throughout the 1930s and ’40s, corporate leaders marketed a new ideology that combined elements of Christianity with an anti-federal libertarianism. Powerful business lobbies like the United States Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers led the way, promoting this ideology’s appeal in conferences and P.R. campaigns. Generous funding came from prominent businessmen, from household names like Harvey Firestone, Conrad Hilton, E. F. Hutton, Fred Maytag and Henry R. Luce to lesser-known leaders at U.S. Steel, General Motors and DuPont.

In a shrewd decision, these executives made clergymen their spokesmen. As Sun Oil’s J. Howard Pew noted, polls proved that ministers could mold public opinion more than any other profession. And so these businessmen worked to recruit clergy through private meetings and public appeals. Many answered the call, but three deserve special attention.

The Rev. James W. Fifield — known as “the 13th Apostle of Big Business” and “Saint Paul of the Prosperous” — emerged as an early evangelist for the cause. Preaching to pews of millionaires at the elite First Congregational Church in Los Angeles, Mr. Fifield said reading the Bible was “like eating fish — we take the bones out to enjoy the meat. All parts are not of equal value.” He dismissed New Testament warnings about the corrupting nature of wealth. Instead, he paired Christianity and capitalism against the New Deal’s “pagan statism.”

Through his national organization, Spiritual Mobilization, founded in 1935, Mr. Fifield promoted “freedom under God.” By the late 1940s, his group was spreading the gospel of faith and free enterprise in a mass-circulated monthly magazine and a weekly radio program that eventually aired on more than 800 stations nationwide. It even encouraged ministers to preach sermons on its themes in competitions for cash prizes. Liberals howled at the group’s conflation of God and greed; in 1948, the radical journalist Carey McWilliams denounced it in a withering exposé. But Mr. Fifield exploited such criticism to raise more funds and redouble his efforts.

Meanwhile, the Rev. Abraham Vereide advanced the Christian libertarian cause with a national network of prayer groups. After ministering to industrialists facing huge labor strikes in Seattle and San Francisco in the mid-1930s, Mr. Vereide began building prayer breakfast groups in cities across America to bring business and political elites together in common cause. “The big men and the real leaders in New York and Chicago,” he wrote his wife, “look up to me in an embarrassing way.” In Manhattan alone, James Cash Penney, I.B.M.’s Thomas Watson, Norman Vincent Peale and Mayor Fiorello H. La Guardia all sought audiences with him.

In 1942, Mr. Vereide’s influence spread to Washington. He persuaded the House and Senate to start weekly prayer meetings “in order that we might be a God-directed and God-controlled nation.” Mr. Vereide opened headquarters in Washington — “God’s Embassy,” he called it — and became a powerful force in its previously secular institutions. Among other activities, he held “dedication ceremonies” for several justices of the Supreme Court. “No country or civilization can last,” Justice Tom C. Clark announced at his 1949 consecration, “unless it is founded on Christian values.”

The most important clergyman for Christian libertarianism, though, was the Rev. Billy Graham. In his initial ministry, in the early 1950s, Mr. Graham supported corporate interests so zealously that a London paper called him “the Big Business evangelist.” The Garden of Eden, he informed revival attendees, was a paradise with “no union dues, no labor leaders, no snakes, no disease.” In the same spirit, he denounced all “government restrictions” in economic affairs, which he invariably attacked as “socialism.”

In 1952, Mr. Graham went to Washington and made Congress his congregation. He recruited representatives to serve as ushers at packed revival meetings and staged the first formal religious service held on the Capitol steps. That year, at his urging, Congress established an annual National Day of Prayer. “If I would run for president of the United States today on a platform of calling people back to God, back to Christ, back to the Bible,” he predicted, “I’d be elected.”

Dwight D. Eisenhower fulfilled that prediction. With Mr. Graham offering Scripture for Ike’s speeches, the Republican nominee campaigned in what he called a “great crusade for freedom.” His military record made the general a formidable candidate, but on the trail he emphasized spiritual issues over worldly concerns. As the journalist John Temple Graves observed: “America isn’t just a land of the free in Eisenhower’s conception. It is a land of freedom under God.” Elected in a landslide, Eisenhower told Mr. Graham that he had a mandate for a “spiritual renewal.”

Although Eisenhower relied on Christian libertarian groups in the campaign, he parted ways with their agenda once elected. The movement’s corporate sponsors had seen religious rhetoric as a way to dismantle the New Deal state. But the newly elected president thought that a fool’s errand. “Should any political party attempt to abolish Social Security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs,” he noted privately, “you would not hear of that party again in our political history.” Unlike those who held public spirituality as a means to an end, Eisenhower embraced it as an end unto itself.

Uncoupling the language of “freedom under God” from its Christian libertarian roots, Eisenhower erected a bigger revival tent, welcoming Jews and Catholics alongside Protestants, and Democrats as well as Republicans. Rallying the country, he advanced a revolutionary array of new religious ceremonies and slogans.

The first week of February 1953 set the dizzying pace: On Sunday morning, he was baptized; that night, he broadcast an Oval Office address for the American Legion’s “Back to God” campaign; on Thursday, he appeared with Mr. Vereide at the inaugural National Prayer Breakfast; on Friday, he instituted the first opening prayers at a cabinet meeting.

The rest of Washington consecrated itself, too. The Pentagon, State Department and other executive agencies quickly instituted prayer services of their own. In 1954, Congress added “under God” to the previously secular Pledge of Allegiance. It placed a similar slogan, “In God We Trust,” on postage that year and voted the following year to add it to paper money; in 1956, it became the nation’s official motto.

During these years, Americans were told, time and time again, not just that the country should be a Christian nation, but that it always had been one. They soon came to think of the United States as “one nation under God.” They’ve believed it ever since.

Kevin M. Kruse is a professor of history at Princeton and the author, most recently, of “One Nation Under God: How Corporate America Invented Christian America.”

A version of this op-ed appears in print on March 15, 2015, on page SR1 of the New York edition with the headline: How Business Made Us Christian.

"My hope is that you may become free from the material world and strive to understand the meaning of the heavenly world, the world of lasting qualities, the world of truth, the world of eternal kingliness, so that your life may not be barren of results, for the life of the material man has no fruit of reality. Lasting results are produced by reflecting the heavenly existence."  Abdu'l-Baha  Divine Philosophy p. 57

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" Declaration of Independence
"I may not be the man I want to be; I may not be the man I ought to be; I may not be the man I could be; I may not be the man I can be; but praise God, I'm not the man I once was." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.

 

 

From: Eric Kramer
Subject: Traitorous Tricky Dick (George Will Confirms Nixon's Vietnam Treason)

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/08/12/george-will-confirms-nixons-vietnam-treason

George Will Confirms Nixon's Vietnam Treason

by Bob Fitrakis, Harvey Wasserman

President Nixon, with edited transcripts of Nixon White House Tape conversations
during broadcast of his address to the Nation, on April 29, 1974.
Richard Nixon was a traitor.

The new release of extended versions of Nixon's papers now confirms this long-standing belief, usually dismissed as a "conspiracy theory" by Republican conservatives. Now it has been substantiated by none other than right-wing columnist George Will.

Nixon's newly revealed records show for certain that in 1968, as a presidential candidate, he ordered Anna Chennault, his liaison to the South Vietnam government, to persuade them to refuse a cease-fire being brokered by President Lyndon Johnson.

Nixon's interference with these negotiations violated President John Adams's 1797 Logan Act, banning private citizens from intruding into official government negotiations with a foreign nation.

Published as the 40th Anniversary of Nixon's resignation approaches, Will's column confirms that Nixon feared public disclosure of his role in sabotaging the 1968 Vietnam peace talks. Will says Nixon established a "plumbers unit" to stop potential leaks of information that might damage him, including documentation that he believed was held by the Brookings Institute, a liberal think tank. The Plumbers' later break-in at the Democratic National Committee led to the Watergate scandal that brought Nixon down.

Nixon's sabotage of the Vietnam peace talks was confirmed by transcripts of FBI wiretaps. On November 2, 1968, LBJ received an FBI report saying Chernnault told the South Vietnamese ambassador that "she had received a message from her boss: saying the Vietnamese should "hold on, we are gonna win."

As Will confirms, Vietnamese did "hold on," the war proceeded and Nixon did win, changing forever the face of American politics—with the shadow of treason permanently embedded in its DNA.

The treason came in 1968 as the Vietnam War reached a critical turning point. President Lyndon Johnson was desperate for a truce between North and South Vietnam. 

LBJ had an ulterior motive: his Vice President, Hubert Humphrey, was in a tight presidential race against Richard Nixon. With demonstrators in the streets, Humphrey desperately needed a cease-fire to get him into the White House. 

Johnson had it all but wrapped it. With a combination of gentle and iron-fisted persuasion, he forced the leaders of South Vietnam into an all-but-final agreement with the North. A cease-fire was imminent, and Humphrey’s election seemed assured.

But at the last minute, the South Vietnamese pulled out. LBJ suspected Nixon had intervened to stop them from signing a peace treaty. 

In the Price of Power (1983), Seymour Hersh revealed Henry Kissinger—then Johnson’s adviser on Vietnam peace talks—secretly alerted Nixon’s staff that a truce was imminent. 

According to Hersh, Nixon “was able to get a series of messages to the Thieu government [of South Vietnam] making it clear that a Nixon presidency would have different views on peace negotiations.”

Johnson was livid. He even called the Republican Senate Minority Leader, Everett Dirksen, to complain that “they oughtn’t be doing this. This is treason.”

“I know,” was Dirksen’s feeble reply.

Johnson blasted Nixon about this on November 3rd, just prior to the election. As Robert Parry of Consortiumnews.com has written: “when Johnson confronted Nixon with evidence of the peace-talk sabotage, Nixon insisted on his innocence but acknowledged that he knew what was at stake.” 

Said Nixon: “My, I would never do anything to encourage….Saigon not to come to the table….Good God, we’ve got to get them to Paris or you can’t have peace.”

But South Vietnamese President General Theiu—a notorious drug and gun runner—did boycott Johnson’s Paris peace talks. With the war still raging, Nixon claimed a narrow victory over Humphrey. He then made Kissinger his own national security adviser. 

In the four years between the sabotage and what Kissinger termed “peace at hand” just prior to the 1972 election, more than 20,000 US troops died in Vietnam. More than 100,000 were wounded. More than a million Vietnamese were killed. 

But in 1973, Kissinger was given the Nobel Peace Prize for negotiating the same settlement he helped sabotage in 1968.

According to Parry, LBJ wanted to go public with Nixon’s treason. But Clark Clifford, an architect of the CIA and a pillar of the Washington establishment, talked Johnson out of it. LBJ’s close confidant warned that the revelation would shake the foundations of the nation. 

In particular, Clifford told Johnson (in a taped conversation) that “some elements of the story are so shocking in their nature that I’m wondering whether it would be good for the country to disclose the story and then possibly have [Nixon] elected. It could cast his whole administration under such doubt that I think it would be inimical to our country’s best interests.”

In other words, Clifford told LBJ that the country couldn’t handle the reality that its president was a certifiable traitor, eligible for legal execution. 

Fittingly, Clark Clifford’s upper-crust career ended in the disgrace of his entanglement with the crooked Bank of Credit and Commerce (BCCI), which financed the terrorist group Al Qaeda and whose scandalous downfall tainted the Agency he helped found.

Johnson lived four years after he left office, tormented by the disastrous war that destroyed his presidency and his retirement. Nixon won re-election in 1972, again with a host of dirty dealings, then became the first American president to resign in disgrace.

 

 

From: Morris Dees; Founder, Southern Poverty Law Center; FIGHTING HATE // TEACHING TOLERANCE // SEEKING JUSTICE
Subject: SPLC files suit against private probation company under RICO act

Let me tell you about an outrage we’ve just exposed in Alabama.

We filed a federal racketeering suit against a company called Judicial Correction Services (JCS) and the city of Clanton.

Empowered by the city, JCS earns its profits by threatening poor people with debtors’ prison when they can’t pay traffic fines.

It’s extortion, plain and simple. And it’s part of a wave of privatization and shameless profiteering that’s perverting our criminal justice system.

This brand of “justice” is devastating to people who are struggling just to stay afloat – people like Roxanne, one of our clients.

After getting traffic tickets, a city court put Roxanne, 49, on what’s called “pay-only” probation – meaning it’s not real probation, just a debt collection scheme.

Her probation meant she had to leave her job to visit the JCS office once a month to fork over $145. But the money wasn’t all going toward her fines. JCS pocketed $40 each time – prolonging her ordeal and deepening her financial struggle.

Roxanne earned very little on an assembly line making automobile seats. Shortly after her “probation” began, she was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and had to miss three months of work. Later, because of a suspended license, she sometimes walked six miles to a spot where she could flag down co-workers for a ride to work – even though she was in pain.

When a tearful Roxanne fell behind on her payments, a JCS employee threatened her with jail and scheduled multiple appointments, sometimes just days apart, to make more payments. When she made partial payments, JCS still took its cut.

The local JCS manager would often brandish handcuffs as probationers waited in the office to make payments. Sometimes, police would come in the back door and arrest those who couldn’t pay enough.

Roxanne did everything she could to keep up. She borrowed money. She ignored her mounting medical and utility bills. She barely ate for a week. She took out a high-interest loan. She lived in constant fear of going to jail.

Roxanne is just one of thousands facing this kind of exploitation in communities across America. JCS, in fact, operates in nearly 100 Alabama municipalities and in many other states as well.

I’m sickened by this practice.

We’re determined to help vulnerable people like Roxanne by stopping this appalling abuse of the justice system.

Thank you for supporting this work. Only through the compassion of our supporters are we able to pursue justice for those who have no other champion.

 

 

From: Fire2020
Subject: Report on Domestic Terrorism/Lynching in America

http://www.eji.org/files/EJI%20Lynching%20in%20America%20SUMMARY.pdf

 

End of MPEN e-Newsletter