U.S. and the rest of the world must cooperate for the benefit of all

Friday, September 25, 2015

[mpen-dayton4] FW: "NYT Today's Headline: Pope Francis, ..." & "Ted Talk: The Rich Do Not Create Jobs" & & "Remember Net Neutrality? Now it's on trial" and more

FYI.     Best, Munsup

P.S. Please reply back to me with ‘unsubscribe’ added on the subject line if you no longer want to receive
          my e-Newsletters. The convenient link to unsubscribe is no longer available due to security reasons.
P.P.S. "He who dares not offend cannot be honest" - Thomas Paine
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

·         FW: NYT Today's Headline: Pope Francis, in Congress, Pleads for Unity on World's Woes

·         FW: Right-wing congressman attacks Pope Francis

·         FW: Native Groups Protest Pope Francis’ Canonization of Junípero Serra – DN

·         FW: Presidential candidates scheduled to address extremist summit

·         FW: Boehner shocker: not so shocking

·         FW: "Iceland announces boycott of Israeli goods" | Fox News

·         FW: Ted Talk: The Rich Do Not Create Jobs

·         FW: Polls & religions (forwarded by Jim Lucas)

·         FW: Debating the Debates

·         FW: Remember Net Neutrality? Now it's on trial

·         FW: McNay Discusses College 'Bloat' on TV; HB 311 Addresses Mitigating Rate

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: NYTimes
Subject: Today's Headlines: Pope Francis, in Congress, Pleads for Unity on World's Woes


Top News of The New York Times Francis in America

Pope Francis, in Congress, Pleads for Unity on World's Woes

By PETER BAKER and JIM YARDLEY

Speaking to lawmakers on Thursday, the pope issued a call to action on issues largely favored by liberals, including a critique of the excesses of capitalism and a defense of immigration.

.Graphic Graphic: Inside Pope Francis' Address to Congress

Pope Francis received an exuberant reception before addressing a joint meeting of Congress on Thursday.

 

 

From: Michael Sherrard, Faithful America
Subject: Right-wing congressman attacks Pope Francis

One of Congress's most notorious anti-immigrant bigots has a new target: Pope Francis.

In his address to Congress yesterday, Pope Francis spoke eloquently about the moral responsibility to welcome immigrants, asking, "Is this not what we want for our own children?"

But Iowa Rep. Steve King trashed the pope's remarks, blisteringly declaring that immigration would "sink America" and even stating that the leader of 1.2 billion Catholics worldwide "doesn't know what he's talking about."

Right-wing conservatives who tout their faith to get elected are quick to dismiss Christian leaders when they call for moral action on climate or immigration. We need to show that countless American Christians stand with Pope Francis on immigrants and refugees -- not hatemongers like Steve King.

Tell Congress: Christians stand with Pope Francis, not Steve King.

For more information:
"Rep. Steve King Calls Out Pope For Not Understanding Nation States, Importance Of Borders," Talking Points Memo, September 24, 2015

 

 

From: khalfani718
Subject: Native Groups Protest Pope Francis’ Canonization of Junípero Serra - DN


http://www.democracynow.org/2015/9/23/native_groups_protest_pope_francis_canonization

Native Groups Protest Pope Francis’ Canonization of
Junípero Serra over Role in California Genocide


Pope Francis’ decision to canonize the 18th century Spanish missionary Junípero Serra has drawn a strong protest from many indigenous groups. Serra founded nine of the 21 missions in California that later were the basis of what is now the modern state. Hundreds of thousands of people died after the missionaries arrived. According to historian Alvin Josephy, what happened in California "was as close to genocide as any tribal people had faced, or would face, on the North American continent." We speak to Valentin Lopez, chair of the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band. He’s been leading efforts to oppose Pope Francis’ decision to canonize Father Junípero Serra.

Transcript

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And, Valentin Lopez, I wanted to ask you about this—the founder of the California missions and the controversial role he is seen as having played throughout history, yet the pope is talking now about the possibility of canonization for him.

VALENTIN LOPEZ: Yes, he will be canonizing Junípero Serra in the—today, I believe, later today, here—in Washington. Junípero Serra was brutal for the California Indians. He was the first padre presidente. As a result of that, it was his responsibility to develop the systems and the regulations and the policies for capturing and caring for the—well, I say "caring for"—and holding the Indians. They would go out with soldiers and forcefully capture the Indians and march them to the mission. Once they got to the mission, they could not leave. They were a labor force for the missions. They were a slave labor force for the missions. If they ran away, they would send out the soldiers to capture them and bring them back, and they would be whipped repeatedly, sometimes for up to a month.

During the mission time—also, the other things that the missions are, that they separated families, mothers from fathers, from children. Part of the reason for that is so that the parents couldn’t pass on the culture to the children, and so it was an actual—a culturecide of the indigenous people there. The missions would use shackles, and they used stocks on the Indians. The women that were—when they separated the families, the women were repeatedly raped by the soldiers. There was no other women in California at that time. And so, the men would go into the women’s dormitory or barrack at nighttime and just repeatedly rape them. Those dormitories were locked, but the soldiers would just go on in and repeatedly rape them.

The conditions of the missions were horrible. They would just put a pot in the corner for the—to use as a bathroom, and that was all, and they were not showering and stuff like that, so they talked about the smell in there just being horrible. Whenever disease would come, it would just go through like a wildfire. It wasn’t unusual to have 10—I mean, 1,200 Indians dying at one time. In Mission San Juan Bautista, during that period of time, there were over 19,000—during a 36-year period of time—26, rather, year period of time, 19,421 Indians died. At the beginning of the mission period, there were 30,000 Ohlone Indians. That’s Monterey to San Francisco. At the end of the mission period, there were less than 100. In total, over 150,000 California Indians died under this system that Junípero Serra developed.

AMY GOODMAN: Professor Rubén Mendoza of California State University, Monterey Bay, was invited to the Vatican in April as part of a panel of experts to discuss the basis for Father Serra’s canonization. Mendoza told USA Today, quote, "Father Serra was not only a man of his time, he was a man ahead of his time in his advocacy for native people on the frontier." Others have also defended the pope’s choice for canonization. Monsignor J. Michael McKiernan of Mission Basilica San Juan Capistrano said Father Serra helped spread the love and mercy of God.

MONSIGNOR J. MICHAEL McKIERNAN: I think the role of somebody like Serra, who had human flaws and difficulties and struggles and was set in his own time, yet had a vision and had an ability to look into a place and say, you know, "We need to bring Christianity here, share the love of God and the mercy of God with the people of this time."

AMY GOODMAN: If, Valentin Lopez, you could respond to these comments?

VALENTIN LOPEZ: Two things. When they were closing the mission, the last padre presidente said, "We are going to be judged very harshly. All we have done was consecrate, baptize and bury the Indians. There are no Indians along the coast of California. We have killed—they’re all dead." And they said, "We need to come up with a"—basically, that we need to come up with an alibi or an excuse for what happened. And so the Catholic Church started creating the myth that Junípero Serra was wonderful to the Indians, that the Indians came in voluntarily, they came in for a better life, they came in to learn agriculture, and they came in to find God. And they started teaching that. And then, in the California schools, when they started developing their curriculum for schools to teach the mission period, they went to the churches to find out about the mission period, and that’s what they learned. And so, for generations, you know, I mean, ever since the time beginning, that is what they taught, that Junípero Serra was a very gentle and kind person. But there’s nothing that can be any further from the truth.

And saying that he is a man of his—well, the Catholic Church has evidence of what I just said. The Catholic Church, if you went to a lot of the Catholic websites, they will say that Junípero Serra was the first person to develop a bill of rights and that he developed a 32-point bill of rights for the California Indian. And all of the Catholic sites refer to that. But yet, whenever you go look for that site—that bill of rights, it’s very hard to find. And when you find it, all it is is a document that is meant to increase Serra’s power over the military and give him more control over the Indians. Spain wanted to go to develop cities in California, so they can bring in other people. They wanted to develop San Jose and Los Angeles. But Serra wanted to build additional missions and stuff for the Indians. And as a result of that, there was a big struggle, and so he wrote a 32-point bill of rights for the Indians that had nothing to do with Indians.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Well, Valentin, I wanted to ask you, in—contrary to what the pope has done here with the Spanish presence in the United States, he was speaking earlier this year in Bolivia, where he apologized for the Catholic Church’s complicity in the oppression of indigenous people in Latin America. This is what he said.

POPE FRANCIS: [translated] I say this to you with regret: Many grave sins were committed against the native peoples of America in the name of God. My predecessors acknowledged this, CELAM has said it, and I, too, wish to say it. Like Saint John Paul II, I ask that the church "kneel before God and implore forgiveness for the past and present sins of her sons and daughters." I would also say, and here I wish to be quite clear, as was Saint John Paul II: I humbly ask forgiveness, not only for the offenses of the church herself, but also for crimes committed against the native peoples during the so-called conquest of America.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: That was Pope Francis in Bolivia. But many native peoples are calling on him to renounce, finally, the doctrine of discovery that was pronounced in certain papal bulls. Could you talk about that, as well?

VALENTIN LOPEZ: The documents of discovery were documents that were issued—were papal bulls. That means they’re basically the word of God, given by the popes in the mid- to late 1400s and very early 1500s. The popes issued a number of papal bulls that said that it was—that the indigenous people are pagans, savages and heathens, that the indigenous people have no soul, indigenous people are the enemies of Christ, that we should be cast into perpetual slavery, and that all our property and our possessions should be taken. And that right there was the basis for the conquering and conquest of much of the world, including India, Indonesia, the Pacific Islands and all of the Americas.

AMY GOODMAN: You wrote a letter to the pope opposing the canonization of Father Serra; as well, you wrote it to Jerry Brown, the governor of California. Did you receive a response on either case?

VALENTIN LOPEZ: We’ve actually written six letters to Pope Francis and two letters to Governor Brown. We received one response about two weeks ago from the archbishop of New York, who’s at the Holy See Mission at the United Nations. Basically, he said that the church has received the letters and read them, and the secretary of state asked him to forward an historical note, one-page historical note, that was developed in 1986, I believe. And that historical note said very simply that the church has looked at all the records and had the best historians take a look at Serra’s life, and they all conclude that Serra is worthy of sainthood. And they do this with—and they are recommending the sainthood with a clear conscience.

AMY GOODMAN: We’re going to break and come back to this discussion. Valentin Lopez is chair of the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band, opposing the canonization of Father Serra. We’re also joined by Julie Byrne, a professor at Hofstra University. Her forthcoming book is called The Other Catholics. And when we come back, we will be speaking with Esmeralda Domínguez, why she walked with about 100 women, many of them undocumented, to greet the pope in Washington, D.C., today. Stay with us.

Show Full Transcript ›
DOWNLOAD:  VIDEOAUDIOGET CD/DVDMORE FORMATS

RELATED STORIES
  

Popeobama

Obama-francis2

Pope Francis Calls on U.S. to Combat Climate Change & Build a “Truly Tolerant and Inclusive" Society
Pope Francis in the USA: Calling for Revolution of Tenderness, Pope Touches Down in Richest Nation

 

 

From: Southern Poverty Law Center; FIGHTING HATE // TEACHING TOLERANCE // SEEKING JUSTICE
Subject: Presidential candidates scheduled to address extremist summit


Presidential candidates, elected officials
to speak at major extremist conference


Donald Trump, Ben Carson, Ted Cruz and most of the other GOP presidential candidates are planning to speak at this weekend’s Values Voter Summit – the annual far-right conference sponsored by anti-LGBT hate groups. The Family Research Council, the host, will be honoring the Kentucky county clerk who refused to issue same-sex marriage licenses after the Supreme Court’s marriage equality ruling.
READ MORE

SPLC exclusive: Alabama state auditor
speaks to neo-Confederate hate group


Our investigators have revealed that Alabama state auditor Jim Zeigler addressed the racist League of the South last week. The League is a neo-Confederate hate group that advocates for a second Southern secession and the establishment of a Christian theocracy ruled by white people.
READ MORE

 

 

From: Michael Keegan
Subject: (Supporter Update) Boehner shocker: not so shocking

News just broke today that Speaker of the House John Boehner will resign from Congress at the end of October, apparently choosing to avoid the indignity of a coup by the Tea Party House majority. Another way to put it would be that a Speaker who tried to lead the party of Reagan just got told "you’re fired!" by the party of Trump.

One of the many famous quotes attributed to Yogi Berra, who passed away this week at the age of 90, was, “When you come to a fork in the road, take it!”

Well, we are definitely at a fork in the road, but this one is a lot clearer.

This latest proof that the GOP has gone way off the deep end -- even too far to the right for John Boehner -- reiterates that Americans are faced with the clearest choice imaginable on so many issues, and on which set of values will set the course for our country, not just for the four years following the next election but for an entire generation.

2016 and the Supreme Court

PFAW just yesterday released a new report titled, “Judgment Day 2016: The Future of the Supreme Court as a Critical Issue in the 2016 Presidential Election.”

It examines more than 80 5-4 decisions the Court has issued since President George W. Bush pushed the nation’s highest court far rightward with his nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito, and shows the effect that new justices could have on the Court’s direction. 

The report reviews and analyzes 5-4 court decisions in eleven key areas: Money in politics; Civil and voting rights; LGBT rights; Reproductive freedom and women’s rights; Workplace fairness; Protecting the environment; Religious liberty; Gun violence; Consumer protection; Access to justice; and Protection against government abuse.

The entire 60-page report is available here.

You can read a much shorter synopsis by the report’s chief author PFAW Senior Fellow Elliot Mincberg in Huffington Post here.

Government Shutdowns and the War on Women

The resurgent Tea Party is not only dominating the GOP presidential primary, it’s playing a dangerous game on Capitol Hill with right-wing members of Congress threatening a government shutdown over funding of Planned Parenthood. This tantrum was cued by a recent smear campaign, based on fraudulent, highly-edited “sting” videos promoting lies about the lifesaving healthcare provider. Republicans have already held several witch hunt congressional hearings and this week held a series of votes not only on defunding Planned Parenthood but on a 20-week abortion ban. And you’ve no doubt seen every GOP presidential candidate piling on Planned Parenthood in the debates and jockeying for the title of Absolute Worst when it comes to issues of women’s equality and women’s health.

We’ve been pushing back hard against these attacks. Thousands of PFAW members have been taking repeated action, serving as a crucial part of the national backlash against the Right’s War on Women and as the echo chamber in support of Planned Parenthood. Next week, at least 170,000 petition signatures will be delivered to Congress from PFAW activists alone and staff and members will take part in a national “Pink Out” day of action.

More Big News of the Week:

With his calls for action on climate change being a central focus of Pope Francis’s visit to Washington, our friends in the environmental movement organized a large rally outside of the Capitol as the Pope addressed Congress. PFAW’s Government By the People Campaign Coordinator Rio Tazewell spoke at the event about the inextricable connection between the issues of climate change and big money in politics.

Today kicks off the annual Values Voter Summit, hosted by the Family Research Council and featuring a long list of radical Religious Right leaders AND Republican politicians, including many presidential candidates -- including Donald Trump. Get the best and most detailed coverage of the event anywhere at PFAW’s RightWingWatch.org.

Scott Walker -- Another one bites the dust as Walker closed up shop on his presidential bid. Right Wing Watch coverage of Walker’s extremism was relied upon heavily by the news media’s coverage of Walker’s campaign since it began back in July and most recently was even featured on the Late Show with Stephen Colbert in the host’s farewell “tribute” to the far-right Wisconsin governor.

None of this work could be done without your committed, ongoing support. We are very grateful.

 

 

From: Judy Burnett
Subject: "Iceland announces boycott of Israeli goods"| Fox News

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/09/17/iceland-announces-boycott-israeli-goods/?intcmp=ob_article_sidebar_video&intcmp=obinsite

 

 

From: khalfani718
Subject: FW: Ted Talk: The Rich Do Not Create Jobs

Check out this Ted Talk, fascinating: https://youtu.be/CKCvf8E7V1g

 

 

From: James Lucas
Subject: Polls and Religions


POLLS SHOW SYRIANS OVERWHELMINGLY BLAME US FOR ISIS
By Eric Zuesse
http://www.globalresearch.ca/polls-show-syrians-overwhelmingly-blame-u-s-for-isis/5476717


CAN MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANS LIVE IN PEACE?
By Thomas C. Mountain

Wouldn’t it be great if there was a place in the world where Muslims and Christians live in peace?
Where their children play together, their families eat together, Christians visiting their Muslim neighbors at Eid, Muslims going to eat next door at Easter?
http://www.countercurrents.org/mountain220915.htm

 

 

From: Raynard Jackson
Subject: Debating the Debates


Debating the Debates
September 21, 2015


Every time I think the media has sank below the point of no return on the scale of embarrassment; they prove to the world that there is truly no floor for how low they can go.

Of course I am talking about last week’s Republican presidential debate hosted by the Comedy News Network (CNN).  Their on air talent did not try to hide the fact that their stated goal, individually and as a supposed news outlet, was to get the candidates to attack each other personally.

Both the preliminary and main debates each spent the first 20 minutes or so talking exclusively about Donald Trump; not about the policy positions of Trump, but rather about some personal comment he made about one of the candidates.

For CNN, the debates were all about theatrics and “gotcha” moments; it was all about ratings and ultimately money by selling advertising during the debates. 

During future presidential elections, all debates, both Republican and Democrat, should be hosted by C-SPAN where they are known to make their on air talent as invisible as possible.  Debates should be about the issues that are affecting the American people, not all the sideshows that the media are interested in promoting.

Most of the elite media, with its openly liberal bias, makes these debates about them and their networks, not about the American people.
I am also very amazed and amused by the elite media’s constant lecturing about diversity (see actor Matt Damon lecturing Black film producer Effie Brown about the lack of diversity in Hollywood) and yet they rarely display it when given the opportunity.

Why does the media and both the Republican and Democratic Party continue to ignore the more than 200 Black owned newspapers we have in the U.S.?  To my knowledge, there has never been a reporter from a Black newspaper asked to be part of a presidential debate by either party.

CNN and FOX News think so little of their own Black on air talent that they made a conscious decision to go with their default positon—all White!

I also put the blame on the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ).  I don’t know why they have not made a public fuss about the lack of diversity in these presidential debates.  I am not a journalist, I am a columnist, but yet I spend more time advocating for their members than they do—go figure.

We have had two Republican debates, yet not one question about about how amnesty for illegals would further decimate the Black community; not one question about “specific” Republican solutions to the high Black unemployment rate under Obama; not one question about how Obama’s policies have devastated Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs); not one question about “specific”
Republican solutions to the shrinking percentage of loans from the Small Business Administration (SBA) to Black businesses going from 8% under Bush to 1.8% under Obama.

Do you really think a white reporter is even aware of these indices affecting the Black community or even care about them?  This is why diversity is important; it makes you aware of things that normally would be of no consequence to you simply because you have no direct connection to the issue.

When the most vulnerable of a society is stronger, those at the top are even stronger.

Yet the media has feigned righteous indignation all because last week Donald Trump didn’t chastise a questioner at one of his town-hall meetings for castigating the Muslim community.  Really?

Weak people take strong positions on weak issues; but I digress.

In these two presidential debates so far, I can guarantee that no Blacks had any input into who the panelists would be or the questions that would be asked.

Am I the only one who continues to notice the optics of these debates? 

None of the candidates have been seen arriving at the venue with any Blacks accompanying them; no Blacks have been seen in the spin rooms after the debates representing any of the candidates on TV, radio, or newspapers; I am not aware of any Blacks being involved in the debate preparations of any of the candidates.

For all the talk of the renewed focus on diversity within the Republican Party, there is absolutely no visible evidence of it anywhere.
If the Republican Party and these various news networks are not able to identify Blacks to participate in their efforts, please contact me and I will be more than happy to introduce you to very capable Blacks with relevant experience.

Have you ever wondered where Republicans find white staffers for their campaigns?  Have you ever wondered where the media finds all of their white on air talent?  Hmmm, just wondering.

I will continue to speak and write about these issues because if they are not dealt with immediately, we Republicans will continue to lose the White House; and on this issue, there is no debate.

Raynard Jackson & Associates, LLC is an internationally recognized political consulting, government affairs, and PR firm based in Washington, DC.  Jackson is an internationally recognized radio talk show host and TV commentator.  He has coined the phrase “straticist.”  As a straticist, he has merged strategic planning with public relations.  Visit his website at:  www.raynardjackson.com.

 

 

From: Rachel Colyer; Senior Campaign Director, Daily Kos
Subject: Signature needed: Remember Net Neutrality? Now it's on trial.

Big Telecom is suing the FCC over our hard-won net neutrality rules.

Today, we are asking you to join Daily Kos and our allies by signing on to the Net Neutrality People’s Brief, which we will file with the DC Circuit Court on behalf of the millions of Americans that support net neutrality.

Will you add your name to the People’s Brief? Click here to read more and add your signature.

The idea is simple—we have a right to weigh in on our democracy. Also, the People's Brief on Net Neutrality is based on the People's Brief in the historic marriage equality ruling, so there is powerful precedent for your voice to be heard.

Here are some of the highlighting principles of the brief:

“The internet has become the beating heart of collective action, where organizing happens, where groups form and strategize to protest, support each other, and challenge power. The internet is the single most important platform in America for organizing, speaking, learning, and protesting.”

“For the overwhelming majority of Americans, using the internet is not optional. As Barack Obama recently stated, “The Internet is not a luxury, it is a necessity.”

"It is essential for finding work, doing work, going to school, learning after school, meeting friends, maintaining friendships, finding love, maintaining relationships, creating art, listening to music, watching movies and tv, and creating videos. But it is also the heart of civic and political life. It is how Americans go about paying taxes, learning about government benefits, learning about governmental activity, communicating with representatives, objecting to governmental behavior, investigating claims made by elected representatives, proposing new ideas, finding others with shared political interests, discussing politics, investigating news stories, creating and maintaining political communities and registering support and protest in collective community."

“For all of the foregoing reasons, the FCC’s Network Neutrality Rules should be upheld.“

This is your official opportunity to join us in the official legal defense of one of our most important victories ever.

Sign your name to the Net Neutrality People’s Brief to be filled at the DC Circuit Court, and stand with the FCC in support of a free and open internet.

*All signers of the brief will have their name on public record in the court proceedings.

 

From: AAUP - Ohio Conference >
Subject: McNay Discusses College 'Bloat' on TV; HB 311 Addresses Mitigating Rate


McNay Talks Administrative Bloat on Dayton-area TV


OCAAUP President John McNay appeared on "WHIO Reports," a local news show in Dayton, to discuss the issue of administrative bloat at Ohio's public colleges and universities. McNay was joined by conservative Ohio University economist Richard

John McNay on WHIO Reports


Vedder, as well as Dayton Daily News reporter Josh Sweigart and host Jim Otte.

McNay used the opportunity to discuss the proliferation of administrative positions, noting that there is one administrator for every 14 students, and the ratio of administrators to full-time faculty is about one-to-one.

Prof. Vedder said that the legislature is "abysmally ignorant" of what is going on at the universities and suggested that while no one wants the General Assembly to micromanage institutions, it has an oversight role.

Vedder went on to say that when administrators get more money, because they are in charge of how it is spent, they choose to spend it on themselves and hire more people that can assist them. McNay agreed and noted the findings of Benjamin Ginsberg in his book The Fall of the Faculty and the Rise of the All-Administrative University.

McNay suggested that one way to contain runaway administrative bloat would be to have the legislature set a ratio of faculty to administrators, such as three faculty to each administrator. Vedder said the idea had merit, but said that administrators likely would figure out a way to game the system.

Josh Sweigart asked if faculty salaries were contributing to the rise in cost, but McNay noted that raises barely have kept up with inflation.

The show was followed up by a column in the Dayton Daily News about administrative bloat driving up costs and tuition. 

 

End of MPEN e-Newsletter

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home