U.S. and the rest of the world must cooperate for the benefit of all

Thursday, October 12, 2017

[mpen-dayton] FW: Trump to end key ACA subsidies; Paul Ryan's hypocrisy; Harvey Weinstein; Steve Bannon; Kakistocracy and more

FYI. Best, Munsup

P.S. Please reply back to me with 'unsubscribe' added to the subject line if you no longer want to receive my e-Newsletters. The convenient link to unsubscribe is no longer available due to security reasons to protect my email servers.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • FW: Breaking News from Washington Post: Trump to end key ACA subsidies,
                                                                                    a move that will threaten the law's marketplaces
  • FW: Make a call to protect the Russia investigation!
  • FW: Millions of jobs are disappearing
  • FW: Tricknology today
  • FW: Paul Ryan's hypocrisy
  • FW: Join JVP contingent in D.C at #NoMuslimBanEver mobilization October 18th
  • FW: Bristol Bay: 'Most valuable salmon fishery in the world'
  • FW: Kakistocracy
  • FW: Las Vegas Massacre Dispels the Myth of Who's Most Violent in This Country
  • FW: Special Las Vegas Shooting 'Oddities' Edition

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Trump to end key ACA subsidies, a move that will threaten the law's marketplaces


President Trump is throwing a bomb into the insurance marketplaces created under the Affordable Care Act, choosing to end critical payments to health insurers that help millions of lower-income Americans afford coverage. The decision follows an executive order on Thursday to allow alternative health plans that skirt the law's requirements.

The White House confirmed late Thursday that it would halt federal payments for cost-sharing reductions, although a statement did not specify when. According to two people briefed on the decision, the cutoff will be as of November. The subsidies total about $7 billion this year.

Trump has threatened for months to stop the payments, which help eligible consumers afford their deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses, but held off while other administration officials warned him that such a move would cause an implosion of the ACA marketplaces that could be blamed on Republicans.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today's most popular stories on The Washington Post

Health insurers and state regulators have been in a state of high anxiety over the prospect of the marketplaces cratering because of such White House action. The fifth year's open-enrollment season for consumers to buy coverage through ACA exchanges will open in less than three weeks, and insurers have said that stopping the cost-sharing payments would be the single greatest step the Trump administration could take to harm the marketplaces — and the law.

Ending the payments is grounds for any insurer to back out of its federal contract to sell health plans for 2018.

The cost-sharing reductions have long been the subject of a political and legal seesaw. Congressional Republicans argued that the sprawling 2010 health-care law that established the subsidies does not include specific language providing appropriations to cover the government's cost. House Republicans sued HHS over the payments during President Barack Obama's second term. A federal court agreed that they were illegal, and the case has been pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

"The bailout of insurance companies through these unlawful payments is yet another example of how the previous administration abused taxpayer dollars and skirted the law to prop up a broken system," a statement from the White House said. "Congress needs to repeal and replace the disastrous Obamacare law and provide real relief to the American people."

For months, administration officials have debated privately about what to do. The president has consistently pushed to cut them off, according to officials and advisers who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations. Some top health officials within the administration, including former Health and Human Services secretary Tom Price, cautioned that this could exacerbate already escalating premiums on the ACA market, these Republicans said.

But some government lawyers also argued that the payments were not authorized under the existing law, according to one administration official, and would be difficult to keep defending in court.

While the administration will now argue that Congress should appropriate the funds if it wants them to continue, such a proposal will face a serious hurdle on Capitol Hill. In a recent interview, Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), who chairs the House Appropriations Subcommittee overseeing HHS, said it would be difficult to muster support for such a move among House conservatives.

One person familiar with the president's decision said that HHS officials and Trump's domestic policy advisers had urged him to continue the payments at least through the end of the year.

The cost-sharing payments are separate from a different subsidy that provides federal assistance on premiums to more than four-fifths of the 10 million Americans with ACA coverage.

Word of the president's decision, which was first reported by Politico, came just hours after he signed the executive order intended to circumvent the ACA by making it easier for individuals and small businesses to buy alternative types of health insurance with lower prices, fewer benefits and weaker government protections.

The White House and allies portrayed the president's move as wielding administrative powers to accomplish what congressional Republicans have failed to achieve: fostering more coverage choices while tearing down the law's insurance marketplaces. Until the White House's announcement late Thursday, the executive order represented Trump's biggest step to date to reverse the health-care policies of the Obama administration, a central promise since last year's presidential campaign.

Critics, who include state insurance commissioners, most of the health-insurance industry and mainstream policy specialists, predict that a proliferation of these other kinds of coverage will have damaging ripple effects, driving up costs for consumers with serious medical conditions and prompting more insurers to flee the law's marketplaces. Part of Trump's action, they say, will spark court challenges over its legality.

The most far-reaching element of the order instructs a trio of Cabinet departments to rewrite federal rules for "association health plans" — a form of insurance in which small businesses of a similar type band together through an association to negotiate health benefits. These plans have had to meet coverage requirements and consumer protections under the 2010 health-care law, but the administration is likely to exempt them from those rules and let such plans be sold from state to state without insurance licenses in each one.

In addition, the order is designed to expand the availability of short-term insurance policies, which offer limited benefits as a bridge for people between jobs or young adults no longer eligible for their parents' health plans. The Obama administration ruled that short-term insurance may not last for more than three months; Trump wants to extend that to nearly a year.

Trump's action also is intended to widen employers' ability to use pretax dollars in "health re­imbursement arrangements" to help workers pay for any medical expenses, not just for health policies that meet ACA rules — another reversal of Obama policy.

In a late-morning signing ceremony in the White House's Roosevelt Room, surrounded by supportive small-business owners, Cabinet members and a few Republicans from Capitol Hill, the president spoke in his characteristic superlatives about the effects of his action and what he called "the Obamacare nightmare."

Trump said that Thursday's move, which will trigger months of regulatory work by federal agencies, "is only the beginning." He promised "even more relief and more freedom" from ACA rules. And although leading GOP lawmakers are eager to move on from their unsuccessful attempts this year to abolish central facets of the 2010 law, Trump said that "we are going to pressure Congress very strongly to finish the repeal and replace of Obamacare."

The executive order will fulfill a quest by conservative Republican lawmakers, especially in the House, who have tried for more than two decades to expand the availability of association health plans by allowing them to be sold, unregulated, across state lines. On the other hand, Trump's approach conflicts with what he and GOP leaders in Congress have held out as a main health-policy goal — giving each state more discretion over matters of insurance.

Health policy experts in think tanks, academia and the health-care industry pointed out that the order's language is fairly broad, so the ensuing fine print in agencies' rules will determine whether the impact will be as sweeping or quick as Trump boasted — his directive will provide "millions of people with Obamacare relief," he said.

Significant questions that remain include whether individuals will be able to join associations, a point that could raise legal issues; whether the administration will start to let association health plans count toward the ACA's requirement that most Americans carry insurance; and whether such plans can charge higher prices to small businesses with sicker workers — or refuse to insure them.

The president issued the directive less than three weeks before the Nov. 1 start of the fifth open-enrollment season in ACA marketplaces for people who do not have access to affordable health benefits through a job. Trump noted that about half of the nation's counties will have just one insurer in their exchange, and he claimed that "many will have none." However, the most recent canvass shows that there will be no "bare" counties in 2018.

A senior administration official, speaking to reporters on the condition of anonymity shortly before Trump signed the order, said that the policy changes it sets in motion will require agencies to follow customary procedures to write new rules and solicit public comment. That means new insurance options will not be available in time for coverage beginning in January, he said.

Even so, with a shortened sign-up period and large cuts in federal funds for advertising and enrollment help already hobbling the marketplaces, "if there's a lot of hoopla around new options that may be available soon, it could be one more thing that discourages enrollment," said Larry Levitt, the Kaiser Family Foundation's senior vice president.

Other aspects of the executive order include commissioning a six-month study, to be led by federal health officials, of ways to limit consolidation within the insurance and hospital industries. Trump also directed agencies to find additional means to increase competition and choice in health care to improve its quality and lower its cost.

The order produced predictable reactions in Congress, with Republican leaders praising the move and Democrats accusing the White House of sabotaging the law.

Among policy experts, critics warned that young and healthy people who use relatively little insurance will gravitate to association health plans because of their lower price tags. That would concentrate older and sicker customers in ACA marketplaces with spiking rates.

Mike Consedine, chief executive of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) said Thursday that the group has long opposed such plans and is concerned that the administration will allow ones that can bypass state licenses and have such weak financial underpinnings that some will collapse, leaving customers stranded and state insurance regulators "picking up the pieces."

[As ACA enrollment nears, administration keeps cutting federal support of the law]

Short-term health insurance makes up a tiny fraction of the policies sold, with fewer than 30 companies covering only about 160,000 people nationwide at the end of last year, according to NAIC data.

Experts could not point to figures for how many association health plans exist or how many people they insure. Such arrangements have existed for decades, and scandals have on occasion exposed "multi-employer welfare arrangements" started by unscrupulous operators who took members' money and either did not have enough reserves to cover hospital bills or absconded with premiums.

The National Federation of Independent Business, a small-business lobby, has pressed Congress to allow use of association plans, arguing that they can be less expensive and give workers more insurance choices. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has promoted the idea, and he stood just behind Trump at the morning ceremony. After nearly walking out of the room without signing the order, the president returned to affix his signature to the document and then hand Paul the pen.

Selling health plans from state to state without separate licenses — the idea underlying much of the president's order — has long been a Republican mantra. It has gained little traction in practice, however.

Half a dozen states — before the ACA was passed in 2010 as well as since then — have passed laws permitting insurers to sell health policies approved by other states. And since last year, the ACA has allowed "compacts" in which groups of states can agree that health plans licensed in any of them could be sold in the others. Under such compacts, federal health officials must make sure the plans offer at least the same benefits and are as affordable as those sold in the ACA marketplaces.

As of this summer, "no state was known to actually offer or sell such policies," according to a report by the National Conference of State Legislatures. A main reason, experts say, is insurers' difficulty in arranging networks of doctors and other providers of care far from their home states.

 

 

From: Katie O'Connell; Digital Communications Coordinator, People For the American Way
Subject: Make a call to protect the Russia investigation!


ALT


Trump said he wanted to get rid of Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller if Mueller's investigation involved business deals and his family finances. Mueller is following the money and working with the IRS's unit that deals with financial crimes like tax evasion and money laundering.

Mueller's investigation has momentum – but Trump could fire Mueller and stop it in its tracks. Bipartisan legislation has been introduced in Congress that would stop the White House from interfering with the investigation -- but this legislation needs your support.

Today we're joining allies for a national call-in day to help advance these crucial bills.

Can you join the call-in day today and demand your members of Congress protect special counsel Robert Mueller?

The various bills would do things like require a federal judge's sign off before they could act and/or give the special counsel the ability to challenge his dismissal in federal court.

All members of Congress need to know that you expect them to stand up to Donald Trump and protect this investigation -- since it may be the only way we can get to the truth.

Call Congress today and tell your members of Congress to protect Mueller and his investigation>>

 

 

From: LinkedIn
Subject: Millions of jobs are disappearing.


Millions of jobs are disappearing

 

 

From: Thomas Scott
Subject: Tricknology today

The Gasoline Car will be History before you Know it

EV Game-Changer: China dumping Gasoline Cars even Sooner

Dyson says it will spend $2.7 billion developing an electric car

Tesla still on top in US electric vehicle sales, GM close behind

 

 

From: Donna De La Cruz, Reform Immigration FOR America
Subject: Paul Ryan's hypocrisy

People like you have been calling on Speaker Paul Ryan for months to bring a clean DREAM Act up for a vote in Congress. We need a bill that allows DREAMers to stay in the country they call home, without adding a single dollar to fund Trump's harsh deportation agenda that is separating families.

Ryan hasn't stepped up. In fact, he's been dodging the question and refusing to meet with immigrant constituents who have invited him to town hall meetings, prayed at his church, and even gone on hunger strike to urge him to stand up for DREAMers. Despite his failure to do the right thing and help young immigrants, he's scheduled to be the keynote speaker at a children's charity dinner this month.

That's a new level of hypocrisy for Ryan. Tell the charity organizers not to let Ryan be their keynote unless he brings a clean DREAM Act to the House and supports a path to citizenship for DREAMers.

Supporting children should mean all children, including immigrant children. But Ryan is failing young immigrants by refusing to bring the DREAM Act, a permanent solution for young immigrants, for a vote in the House. He has no business speaking at the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation children's charity dinner when he won't do his job and keep families together.

Sign the petition urging Cardinal Dolan, the charity event organizer, to take back Ryan's invitation unless he steps up for young immigrants.

 

 

From: Rabbi Alissa Wise; Deputy Director, Jewish Voice for Peace
Subject: [JVP-NewsAndUpdates] Join JVP contingent in D.C at #NoMuslimBanEver mobilization October 18th

Hope you all are holding up as well as can be in this impossible world, and for those that celebrate sukkot: chag sameach! Hope you are enjoying zman simchateinu/season of our joy--I know I needed the extra nudge to be joyful right now.

I am hoping to see some of you on the streets of D.C. in a few weeks as we mobilize to say #NoMuslimBanEver. on Wednesday, October 18th 11:30 am - 3:30 pm.  Let us know you will join us on Facebook and please share that event link far and wide with your networks!

The exact location of the JVP contingent meet-up forthcoming--for now just let us know you will be there so we know how many shirts, posters, and water bottles to bring :)

And for those on the other side of the country--there are solidarity events happening throughout the month that I know many JVP chapters are involved in. If you know of one or are leading one, you can register it here.

As always, it is a pleasure to be in the struggle for justice with all of you! Hope to see many of you in D.C.!

 

 

From: Andrew Tierman
Subject: Bristol Bay: 'Most valuable salmon fishery in the world' – CNNPolitics

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/10/politics/bristol-bay-salmon-invs/index.html

 

 

From: Eric Kramer
Subject: Kakistocracy

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/10/american-kakistocracy/542391/   -  E

 

 

From: Thomas Scott
Subject: Las Vegas Massacre Dispels the Myth of Who's Most Violent in This Country

Las Vegas Massacre Dispels the Myth of Who's Most Violent in This Country

 

From: CLG_News
Subject: Special Las Vegas Shooting 'Oddities' Edition


News Updates from CLG on 12 October 2017

All links are here: http://www.legitgov.org/#breaking_news

Special Las Vegas Shooting 'Oddities' Edition - compiled by LRP --An online copy of this edition
can be found here:
http://www.legitgov.org/Las-Vegas-Shooting-Oddities-Compiled-CLG-News.


'Betting on the downfall': George Soros had a $42 million short open on MGM | 10 Oct 2017 | On Tuesday, September 5th, 2017, the board of MGM Resorts International decided to approve a $1 billion share repurchase program. At 17.7 billion today, the program represented a significant portion of its current market cap. By the end of the week, MGM's CEO, James Murren, had coolly divested himself of 80% of the shares he owned in his company. The divestment came just days before the ex-dividend date on September 8th, 2017. The sales were originally disclosed in a document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Murren had previously divested 57,269 shares on July 31st and August 9th, 2017. It's currently unclear why Murren chose to sell when he did...Mr. Murren and his fellow board members were not the only speculators who were bearish on MGM's prospects. Billionaire investor George Soros also bought $42 million worth of puts on the company, according to SEC filings from mid August. [Notes: MGM Resorts International is the owner of the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino, the site of the October 1, 2017, shooting. See definitions of 'put option' (here) and 'Short (or Short Position)' (here). More info can be found here. --LRP]

Hotel Worker Reported Shooting Before Las Vegas Massacre Started | 12 Oct 2017 | Two days after police revised their timeline for the shooting in Las Vegas, which left 58 dead and hundreds injured, a hotel maintenance worker said he told hotel dispatchers to call the police before the mass shooting started. Originally, police suggested that gunman Stephen Paddock stopped firing on concertgoers from the window of his 32nd floor suite at the Mandalay Bay when he saw hotel security guard Jesus Campos in his hallway. Campos, who took a non-fatal shot to the leg, was credited with protecting a maintenance worker as Paddock fired dozens of shots into the hall. On Wednesday the hotel maintenance worker, Stephen Schuck, revealed that he told hotel dispatchers to call the police as well. Like Campos, Schuck was responding to a report of a jammed fire door.

Las Vegas gunman shot security guard a full six minutes before opening fire on concertgoers, police reveal | 08 Oct 2017 | Police have dramatically changed their account of how the Las Vegas massacre began on Oct. 1, revealing Monday that the gunman [or gunmen] shot a hotel security guard six minutes before opening fire on a country music concert -- raising new questions about why police weren't able to pinpoint the gunman's location sooner. Officials had previously said that [alleged] gunman Stephen Paddock, 64, of Mesquite, Nev., shot Mandalay Bay security guard Jesus Campos after Paddock had unleashed his deadly volley at the Route 91 Harvest Festival, an assault that began at 10:05 p.m. and left 58 people dead, with hundreds more injured. They had credited Campos, who was shot in the leg, with stopping the 10-minute assault on the concert crowd by turning the gunman's attention to the hotel hallway, where Campos was checking an alert for an open door in another guest's room. But Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo said Monday that Paddock shot Campos before his mass shooting -- at 9:59 p.m. -- and they now didn't know why Paddock stopped his attack on the crowd.

Las Vegas shooting eyewitness: There were 'four to five' shooters attacking multiple hotels | 09 Oct 2017 | Facebook user and eyewitness Gio Rios has sent shock-waves throughout the internet after he not only confirmed he was present during the attack, he presented a variety of details that are either unpublished or have been denied by authorities and the mainstream media. "There was more than one shooter, I believe there were 4-5 shooters and I saw/heard 4 of them," Rios claimed. "There was one of their men down in the concert who lit firecrackers either to distract people...or to decoy the Mandalay Bay shooter breaking the windows out of the hotel without being noticed right away." That's right, we now have another eyewitness publicly speaking about multiple shooters just as police originally stated (on the scanners). Keep in mind that other proof of some sort of false flag operation has also been revealed, including automatic gunfire heard at ground level.

Hotel Guest Next Door to Las Vegas Shooter Saw 'Multiple Gunmen' | 03 Oct 2017 | An Australian man who was staying in the room next to the shooter in the Mandalay Bay has confirmed he witnessed multiple gunmen involved in the Las Vegas attack. "There were multiple people dead and multiple shooters. I was just hiding waiting for police to come get us. I got outside safely and was hiding in bushes," Brian Hodge told Australia's Courier-Mail. Mr. Hodge, who was staying in room 32134, next door to Stephen Paddock in room 32135, also provided important information when he revealed that a security guard was killed by police. "My floor is a crime scene. They killed a security guard on my floor." ...Wendy Miller from Cooroy, on the Sunshine Coast -- another Australian caught up in the Las Vegas shooting -- may have provided a missing piece of the puzzle. Also speaking to the Courier-Mail, Ms Miller said...she saw what she described as a "man of interest" run by. Ms Miller said the man sprinted through her hotel after coming off an escalator from the Mandalay Bay. "The man that they [security] were chasing was wearing a security jacket like them," she said.

Receipt Shows Paddock Had Another Guest in His Room Before Shooting --Gunman ordered for two on September 27, four days before massacre | 04 Oct 2017 | An image posted on Facebook by a man who claims he served Stephen Paddock room service shows that the gunman was with a guest during his time at the Mandalay Bay hotel four days before the massacre took place. The receipt shows an employee named Antonio served two guests an "IRD_MB," which means "In Room Dining, Mandalay Bay." The table number is "32135" - which equates to Paddock's room number (135) on the 32nd floor...The receipt shows the number "2" next to the word "Guests". The date on the receipt also says September 27, whereas authorities assert that Paddock checked in the day after on September 28.

Las Vegas gunman Stephen Paddock set up cameras outside his hotel room | 03 Oct 2017 | The [alleged] Las Vegas gunman set up cameras inside and outside his hotel room before firing for nine minutes at the concert crowd below. Police revealed that Stephen Paddock had placed one camera in a food service cart outside his room before he fired on concertgoers at a "progressively rapid rate" through windows on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay. In the latest news conference, Sheriff Joe Lombardo said all but three of the 59 who were killed have now been identified.

Professional With Master's Degree in Photography Analyzes Oddities in Las Vegas Shooter's Photo [Be sure to look this video before the Deep State censors at YouTube take it down, as they did with Gavin Seim's other video.] | 11 Oct 2017 |  Look at this photo from Vegas! By Gavin Seim - published 07 Oct. 2017. They took my first video down. But I have learned more since then. Question everything. The officials are the ones presenting conspiracy theory. I've been a photographer for 20 years and I'm seeing is obvious lies.

Stephen Paddock: Isis insists Las Vegas shooter was 'soldier of caliphate' as authorities probe gunman's motive | 06 Oct 2017 | Isis has repeated its claim of responsibility for the Las Vegas attack while alleging that Stephen Paddock converted to Islam six months ago. Investigators have not yet confirmed any link between the 64-year-old gunman and the terrorist group, with his girlfriend and relatives claiming he had no religious affiliation and was not an extremist. In a new issue of its Arabic propaganda newspaper, Isis celebrated the worst mass shooting in modern American history with a graphic showing the Mandalay Bay stained blood red.

Las Vegas shooting: Isis claims responsibility for deadliest gun massacre in modern US history --Las Vegas shooter used 'weapon of mass destruction', DA says --FBI says no connection with international terror group yet found in ongoing investigation | 02 Oct 2017 | Isis has claimed responsibility for the deadliest mass shooting in modern American history as it continues to lose territory in its self-declared "caliphate". Police said at least 58 people were killed and 500 victims wounded when a gunman opened fire on dense crowds at a concert in Las Vegas. Officials have identified the shooter as Stephen Paddock, a 64-year-old white American who had multiple weapons on the 32nd floor of a nearby hotel, where he is believed to have killed himself. A statement published by the group's Amaq propaganda agency claimed the attacker was a "soldier of the Islamic State". Isis also claimed the gunman "converted to Islam several months ago".

Outrage as Nevada professor suggests Trump deserves blame for Las Vegas massacre | 07 Oct 2017 | A university professor in Las Vegas was filmed in class this week suggesting President Trump deserves some blame for the city's shooting massacre because "all he's done" is "encourage violence." "Right when he got elected, I told my classes, three semesters ago, that some of us won't be affected by this presidency, but others are going to die," University of Nevada, Las Vegas history professor Tessa Winkelmann said Thursday, according to video obtained by the Las Vegas Review-Journal. "Other people will die because of this. And we've seen this happen, right?"

Drexel prof under fire for tweets about Las Vegas shooting | 04 Oct 2017 | A Drexel University professor who has come under fire multiple times for controversial tweets is again in hot water over social-media posts. Law enforcement officials are still trying to determine the motive behind gunman Stephen Paddock's mass shooting in Las Vegas over the weekend. But on Twitter, politics and global studies professor George Ciccariello-Maher placed the blame on "Trumpism" and "white victimization" [Same professor who wanted "white genocide" for Christmas. Wasn't this atrocity an act of white genocide? Didn't he just get his wish, only almost a year later? After all, the shooter chose a country music festival, an all-white audience stereotypically described as Trump supporters and "gun-toters" by the CBS exec., as the target of his rampage. Could it be that he harbored the exact same sentiments as George Ciccariello-Maher?] Hours after the shooting, which has claimed 59 lives and left more than 500 injured, Ciccariello-Maher kicked off a Twitter thread with a three-word message: "A White Man." [Wait, isn't he a "white man," too? Would this be a classic case of PROJECTION onto others ("white men") of GUILT that he (mistakenly) feels?]

Las Vegas victim gets out of bed to shake President Trump's hand despite being shot in the leg during Mandalay Bay massacre | 04 Oct 2017 | A man who was shot in the leg during the Las Vegas mass shooting didn't let his injury hold him back from standing up to greet President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump. Thomas Gunderson was attending the Route 91 Harvest Festival on Sunday night when he was horrifically injured when Stephen Paddock, 64, sprayed bullets on more than 20,000 concertgoers. Gunderson, of California, said he was running toward Mandalay Bay when a bullet pierced his leg...On Gunderson's patient board in his hospital room, he also had the hashtag '#MAGA' written under the statement: 'What's important to me.'


********************************************************
CLG needs your support: http://www.legitgov.org/donate.html

Or, please mail a check or m*ney order to CLG:
Citizens
for Legitimate Government (CLG); P.O. Box 1142; Bristol, CT 06011-1142
Contributions
to CLG are not tax deductible.

Feel free -- and CLG encourages you -- to forward this newsletter to your lists and friends!

Those who wish to be added to the list can go here:
http://www.legitgov.org/#subscribe_clg and add your name.
CLG News Editor-in-Chief: Lori Price. Copyright © 2017, Citizens for Legitimate Government ® All rights reserved.

 

End of Minority People's Email Network (MPEN) e-Newsletter

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home